The end of World Bank Short-Term Consultants

The World Bank is eliminating the Short-Term Consultant by 2027. Here's what you need to know about it

Hi everyone,

For those hunting MDB jobs (which I’m guessing might be you), subscribe to the paid plan to get fresh job listings every Monday. Apply early and track positions before they disappear.

Wondering what’s included? Job listings from December 8, 2025 and earlier are now free to access. Check out the most recent unlocked post here.

Want to get your foot in the door? Landing a consultant role is the best first step. Consultancy opportunities are published every Friday for paid subscribers.

---

The global development finance architecture is executing its most profound workforce transformation in decades. If you work in this sector, or plan to, you need to pay attention.

The World Bank Group has made a definitive decision to eliminate the Short-Term Consultant (STC) appointment type by 2027. This is not a drill. It is a hard stop for a modality that currently employs roughly 22,000 people. Simultaneously, the IMF is tightening its belt with a “flat real budget” and rethinking how it uses external experts.

These are the symptoms of a massive shift toward the “corporatization” and “localization” of development expertise. The era of the “freelance diplomat”, the solo expert contracting directly with the Bank, is ending. We’re moving into an era of corporate vendors and framework agreements.

Here’s the strategic analysis of what is happening, why it matters, and how you survive the transition.

The Death of the “Shadow Workforce”

To understand the scale of this, you have to look at the numbers. The World Bank currently engages about 22,000 Short-Term Consultants. While these contracts are capped at 150 days a year (190 in fragile states), the aggregate labor they provide equals about 7,000 full-time staff positions.

For years, the Bank relied on this “shadow workforce” to bypass headcount caps. It was a convenient arrangement. Managers got high-level expertise without the long-term commitment. Consultants got a foot in the door and a tax-free paycheck (in some cases). But the Board and leadership have decided this dependency is a governance risk. They want to “internalize core functions.”

The goal is to replace that army of freelancers with a smaller, permanent staff and a larger reliance on corporate firms. The “Evolution Roadmap” demands a stable, dedicated workforce to tackle climate change and pandemics. They don’t believe a fragmented army of temporary consultants can deliver that.

The Timeline You Can’t Ignore

The Bank has engineered a “ramp-down” to prevent operational paralysis. You need to know these dates.

Phase 1: The Pilot (Already Active)

The International Finance Corporation (IFC) has already ceased sponsoring G4 visas for STCs as of July 2024. This was the warning shot. It established the precedent for “localization,” restricting DC-based consulting to people who already have U.S. work authorization.

Phase 2: The Freeze (July 2026)

By July 2026, the door closes. No new STC appointments will be permitted. If you are not in the system by then, you never will be under this contract type. The entry pipeline for individual consultants will be sealed.

Phase 3: The Sunset (January 2027)

This is the end of the line. All existing STC contracts must be terminated or converted.

The appointment type is abolished.

The Structural Alternatives: Where Do You Go?

As the STC door slams shut, the Bank is channeling its workforce needs into three specific vessels. You need to understand the legal and financial differences of each.

1. Extended Term Consultants (ETC)

This is the bridge solution. The ETC is a one-year renewable contract with benefits. It includes medical insurance, leave, and a 15% terminal gratuity.

The Catch: It has a hard lifetime cap of three years. Once you serve three years as an ETC, you’re out. You can’t be rehired as an ETC ever again. It’s a strictly time-bound tour of duty.

Managers will also be more selective here because ETCs cost their budget more than STCs did. They will likely consolidate the work of two or three STCs into one ETC role.

2. Full-Time Staff

The stated goal is to move people into staff roles. But don’t expect an automatic conversion. Current consultants must apply for advertised vacancies and compete globally.

The Reality Check: The math doesn’t quite add up. The Bank is removing 7,000 FTEs worth of consultants but only planning to add about 1,000 to 2,000 staff positions. Competition will be pretty tough.

Furthermore, many STCs operating at a high technical level (GG or GH) will find the available staff slots are at lower grades (GE or GF). You may have to take a title cut to get the badge.

3. Corporate Vendors

This is where the bulk of the work is going. The Bank is reclassifying “consultancy” from a Staff Appointment to a Corporate Procurement activity.

The Warning: If you go this route, you’re essentially a vendor. You’re a business. You don’t get a G4 visa. You don’t get the staff tax allowance. You’re fully liable for taxes in your home jurisdiction.

Unless you renegotiate your daily rate upwards significantly, your net income could drop by 20% to 40%.

The Visa Crisis: The “Localization” Trap

This is the most acute risk for international experts. The STC phase-out destroys the G4 visa pathway.

Historically, the Bank sponsored G4 visas for consultants, allowing global talent to live in DC. That’s pretty much over. The new policy dictates that for HQ-based short-term roles, you must already possess U.S. work authorization (Green Card, citizenship, or an existing EAD).

Vendors aren’t eligible for G4 sponsorship. If you transition from STC to Vendor, you lose your legal basis to remain in the United States.

There is also a nasty “15-Year Rule” trap. U.S. immigration law allows certain G4 holders to get a Green Card upon retirement, but you need 15 years of service. Time spent as a consultant does not count toward this. Many long-serving consultants are finding themselves legally stranded.

This aligns with a broader “America First” pressure. Shareholders want efficiency and local employment. The Bank is effectively localizing its DC workforce. If you’re an international expert without a Green Card, your future in DC is a bit more precarious.

The IMF: Austerity and Specialization

While the World Bank is pursuing a structural ban, the IMF is quietly doing the same thing through budget cuts. The Fund is navigating a “flat real budget” trajectory. The post-pandemic resource surge is being unwound.

The IMF has cut travel budgets for externally financed capacity development by over 16% in real terms. That means fewer missions and fewer days for Short-Term Experts (STX).

The Fund is also shifting from “fungible macroeconomists” to “Specialist Economists” in areas like climate and digital money.

They’re building this capacity in-house. Access to the IMF’s work is now guarded by a rigorous Roster of Experts. You need 10+ years of seniority in a Central Bank or Ministry of Finance just to get on the list. The opportunities are shrinking and becoming hyper-specialized.

The New Game: Framework Agreements

So, where’s the work going? It’s moving to Framework Agreements.

To replace the agility of the STC, the Bank is using long-term agreements with large consulting firms. The Bank pre-selects firms (Primary Procurement) and then issues “Call-off Contracts” (Secondary Procurement) when they need specific work done.

This shifts the administrative burden of vetting and insurance to the private sector. It favors big firms like DAI, Tetra Tech, and the Big Four.

The Shift: We’re moving from “Bank-Executed” to “Firm-Executed.” The direct TTL-to-Consultant hiring channel is dying. The new channel is Bank-to-Firm-to-Consultant.

Your Strategic Roadmap

If you want to stay in this game, you need to adapt now. The landscape of 2027 will look nothing like 2024.

1. Migrate to the Firms

Stop trying to network solely with Task Team Leaders (TTLs) at the Bank. Start networking with the firms that hold the Framework Agreements. They’re the ones who will be hiring. They need the expertise that the Bank is shedding.

2. Specialize to Survive

Generalist skills will be absorbed by internal staff. External demand will be reserved for niche skills the Bank cannot justify keeping on payroll full-time. If you do geothermal engineering or complex debt restructuring, you are safe. If you do “general project support,” you are in trouble.

3. Target Recipient-Executed Work

Look for contracts issued by client governments (Project Implementation Units), not the World Bank corporate office. These aren’t subject to the STC ban. The money comes from the Bank, but the government does the hiring.

4. Get Your Visa Sorted

If you’re in DC on a G4 linked to an STC contract, you might need to speak with an immigration counsel soon.

5. Register as a Vendor

If you can’t get a staff role, register as a Sole Proprietor in the WBGeProcure system. It’s a pain. It requires screening for sanctions and conflicts of interest. But it is the only way to get a direct contract if you aren’t staff.

The Bottom Line

The freelance diplomat is dying. The World Bank is becoming a corporate machine that buys services, not just a cooperative that hires individuals.

I’m guessing this transition will be messy.

It’ll be painful for thousands of people who have dedicated their careers to development. But ignoring it will not make it go away. The shadow workforce is stepping into the light, and you need to be ready for what comes next.

---

Make sure you subscribe to MDB Jobs to get the latest vacancies delivered straight to your inbox each Monday, and consultant positions each Friday.